Posts Tagged ‘murder


Goodreads Review: Cracking More Cases

Cracking More Cases: The Forensic Science of Solving Crimes : the Michael Skakel-Martha Moxley Case, the Jonbenet Ramsey Case and Many More!Cracking More Cases: The Forensic Science of Solving Crimes : the Michael Skakel-Martha Moxley Case, the Jonbenet Ramsey Case and Many More! by Henry C. Lee

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Dr. Lee is back again, to wow and amaze us with tales of forensic daring do in a fresh handful of cases.

The problem is, he doesn’t.

While there is some interesting material here, for the most part it felt as though the book was spent talking about all Dr. Lee’s “close and great and professional” friends, with very little in the way of actually discussing the science of the cases, which is what most readers are coming here for. He frequently spends pages upon pages explaining how a given police department screwed up (the chapter on the Ramsey case is particularly laden with this), rather than discussing the evidence that was found and provided useful or interesting.

That being said, the prose is fairly well done, clear and concise. What points he does make are laid out with relative simplicity, not requiring a degree in forensics to understand. It also serves as an interesting springboard if one wishes to delve into the cases via other research; the Martha Moxley case, in particular, proved an interesting study and Dr. Lee has provided an excellent bibliography to run down further information if the reader so desires.

Worth looking at if you’re a fan of the man, or as a starting point for further study. If you’re looking for deep insight into the Ramsey case (which is the most prominent of the cases presented here) you should probably look elsewhere, however.

View all my reviews


Review: Black Dahlia Avenger: A Genius for Murder: The True Story

Black Dahlia Avenger: A Genius for Murder: The True Story
Black Dahlia Avenger: A Genius for Murder: The True Story by Steve Hodel
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Well, this was an interesting one. It wasn’t nearly as bad as some of the other Dahlia-related books I’ve read. Understood the concepts of coherence and logic, and didn’t resort to a whole lot of “And this place was where this guy sometimes went, and that guy once bought a lawnmower from this guy, who once said hi to a lady at this place, which is where my dad once read a book, so my daddy did it!” unlike my personal love-to-hate-it Daddy was the Black Dahlia Killer… but it still feels forced and artificial.

The communiques ostensibly from other law-enforcement officers and forensics professions seem off, in a way I can’t quite explain. The language doesn’t seem right, and they tend to be too full of congratulatory notes saying how awesome the author is. While I personally can agree with much of what is said – and the photographs, assuming they aren’t staged, are fairly compelling – I still feel like someone was tidying it up and hiding other potential possibilities.

Now, supposedly, there are a great many officials – in real life, as opposed to claims made by the author or the book – who subscribe to this theory, some even going so far as to say it’s 100% true and the Dahlia case has been solved… though, one notes, the case is still listed as “open.” Again, I don’t have a problem with the idea – it fits well enough, it’s reasonably logical until the last few pages, and the purported evidence our author submits seems to fit. It just feels too tidy, a little too much like a Patterson novel or a Lifetime TV Movie. That may just be the part of me that doesn’t want the Dahlia case to be definitively solved (or Jack the Ripper, or JFK’s death); the part that says the mystery is the allure, and actually solving it would take the demented fun out of it.

Still, that’s just emotion and whimpering. The book itself is well written, it’s interesting and it gets the point across, even if it does feel a little too pedantic or self-congratulatory at times. The one issue that I have with the book itself is the last few pages, wherein our author discusses his father’s first romance with an older woman, that resulted in a daughter named “Folly,” that was supposedly the impetus for his later crimes. It felt tacked on, rather silly, and is probably why I liken it to Patterson. “We must have a central, single event that led to this crime spree, so it can all be explained in a nice tidy way.” Even if true, it feels too clean and simple for real life.

And then there’s the last page. Where the author tells us that, after finishing the manuscript, he learned new and fascinating facts that call everything into question and require further exploration. (So hurry and go buy the sequel, okay!). A cliffhanger ending with an advertisement for your sequel seems out of place in a book that is supposedly factual. If you had new info that called your findings into question, or shed additional light on them, why not work it in? The copy I have is a first printing, and they had time to add that extra page, so it’s not as though the text was set in stone at that point… just feels hinky. Of course, now I’m going to have to read the second book, and see if that changes my opinion. Oh well.

Final word? Worth reading if serial killers in general or the Black Dahlia case in particular are of interest to you. True or not, the book gives some lovely insight into investigative methods and possible motivations for such actions. They also paint a suitably lurid picture of a modern monster. Take from it what you will.

View all my reviews

Show your support

Adopt an Artist

Take pity, and eternal gratitude will be yours; helps keep this site running and the words flowing.

PayPal Donate Button


Follow Insomniac Nightmares on